Post by sceptic on Feb 26, 2005 17:00:50 GMT
Well, they've really excelled themselves this time.
Having received a letter for my deceased mother on 10/02/05 (the day before the first anniversary of her death), I can't remember if I returned my normal "she is deceased", or "She is deceased, that means she's an EX-PERSON" letter, or just ignored it (I can't find the original correspondence at the moment). However, today, "predictions" for her, done 21/03-23/02, have arrived; the first is for 1 April 2005.
Well. I don't remember asking for the predictions and if they chase payment, I will ask them to supply the original request for the predictions. I cannot remember sending any such request and so the predictions have, as far as I'm concerned, arrived under the auspices of the Unsolicited Services Act (ie they've provided a service which was not requested, therefore payment does not have to be made for it).
If they argue against that, there is also the point that the goods provided (ie the "predictions") are not of merchantable quality and are not fit for the purposes to which they have been provided, viz: predictions regarding the future of my mother, as she has been deceased for over a year and so has no future to which the predictions can relate. They are free to come and collect them, and/or provide return P&P.
I cannot remember sending off any request for the predictions. What has arrived, with them, is an invoice. If I was my mother, she would have probably thought that she had sent off for them and so would pay the invoice (for £24 - the same amount that Evastrella asked my mum to pay her last July, after my mum had replied to her letter of June!) fearing the consequences of bad credit.
I shall await to see what happens. They've given 7 days for payment to be made, and if they chase payment, then I would have to say that it would come under the auspices of fraud and I'm sure I'll have to pass it onto the appropriate authorities.
Having received a letter for my deceased mother on 10/02/05 (the day before the first anniversary of her death), I can't remember if I returned my normal "she is deceased", or "She is deceased, that means she's an EX-PERSON" letter, or just ignored it (I can't find the original correspondence at the moment). However, today, "predictions" for her, done 21/03-23/02, have arrived; the first is for 1 April 2005.
Well. I don't remember asking for the predictions and if they chase payment, I will ask them to supply the original request for the predictions. I cannot remember sending any such request and so the predictions have, as far as I'm concerned, arrived under the auspices of the Unsolicited Services Act (ie they've provided a service which was not requested, therefore payment does not have to be made for it).
If they argue against that, there is also the point that the goods provided (ie the "predictions") are not of merchantable quality and are not fit for the purposes to which they have been provided, viz: predictions regarding the future of my mother, as she has been deceased for over a year and so has no future to which the predictions can relate. They are free to come and collect them, and/or provide return P&P.
I cannot remember sending off any request for the predictions. What has arrived, with them, is an invoice. If I was my mother, she would have probably thought that she had sent off for them and so would pay the invoice (for £24 - the same amount that Evastrella asked my mum to pay her last July, after my mum had replied to her letter of June!) fearing the consequences of bad credit.
I shall await to see what happens. They've given 7 days for payment to be made, and if they chase payment, then I would have to say that it would come under the auspices of fraud and I'm sure I'll have to pass it onto the appropriate authorities.